Solutions/AI Compliance

Run an AI-governance program on the systems that actually run your AI

The EU AI Act asks you to inventory your AI systems, classify their risk, apply controls and human oversight, and prove it on demand. Rizzqo runs that whole program on the real AI you actually deploy — not a generic checklist.

How Rizzqo governs AI

One program, from first inventory to audit-ready evidence, always anchored to the AI systems that produce the risk.

01

Inventory every AI system as an asset

Governance starts with knowing what you run. Rizzqo gives you one live inventory of every AI system you have deployed — the foundation the EU AI Act expects you to maintain, and it stays current as systems are added, retired or reclassified.

02

Classify each system’s EU AI Act risk tier

Not every AI system carries the same obligations. Rizzqo helps you place each one in its EU AI Act risk tier — unacceptable, high, limited or minimal — so you carry only the duties that genuinely apply, and never over-comply on a system that does not need it.

03

Apply controls and human oversight, mapped to requirements

On most programs, obligations live in policy PDFs no one reads and responsibility sits in a shared inbox. Rizzqo puts every duty — including human oversight — on the AI system it governs, with a named person accountable for it, so responsibility is always clear.

04

Monitor, gather evidence and stay audit-ready

High-risk AI demands ongoing risk management and post-market monitoring, not a one-off sign-off. Rizzqo keeps every AI system continuously assessed, so when a regulator or auditor asks, the conformity story is already assembled, not scrambled together after the fact.

Everything an AI-governance program needs

From first classification to post-market monitoring, every duty sits on the real system it governs, so nothing lives in a policy document no one reads.

AI system inventory

One live inventory of every AI system you run, so nothing sits in the shadows outside your program.

Risk-tier classification

Place each system in its EU AI Act tier — unacceptable, high, limited or minimal — so you carry only the obligations that genuinely apply.

Human oversight controls

Keep human-oversight duties owned by the people accountable for each system, not buried in a policy no one revisits.

Data governance

Show that the training and test data behind your AI is properly governed and documented, as high-risk systems require.

Conformity documentation

Pull your technical documentation and evidence together into audit-ready conformity packages, ready before a regulator asks.

Post-market monitoring

Watch deployed AI continuously, so drift, new gaps and regulatory change surface as they happen, not at the next review.

From a list of AI systems to a defensible program

Each AI system carries its own classification, controls and evidence, and its risk connects to the business it supports. Leadership sees not just where a gap is, but everything it puts at risk — and the proof of conformity is ready before anyone asks.

Frequently asked questions

Govern your AI, prove your conformity

See how Rizzqo runs the EU AI Act directly on the AI you actually deploy, so every obligation lands on a real system with a real owner.

Every AI system ownedRisk tiers mappedAudit-ready evidence